Skip to content

What Should A Good GP Website Include?

A friend recently presented a research proposal they’re working on “What should a successful Primary Care Digital offer look like?’ We talked briefly regarding GP websites and the ways we connect with patients. I shared one of my typical random rants. I decided to share some of my thoughts with you. solicit your feedback.

The introduction to this project

When I was informed of this study, my first reaction was to inquire to join the research project as well. In the beginning, I wanted to make sure that someone who had worked within general practices could provide an operational viewpoint. Additionally, I was trying to stay clear of “a solution” that would add more stress to already stretched staff members of the practice. As a practice manager for eight years and working with Patients Groups for over 15 years, I’ve always had an keen interest in using digital technologies to share information and also have connections to the world of digital and user-experience design. It seemed like a great chance to collaborate to tackle this. Like many practices, we realized that our site needed a revamp We had joined our Web hosting service provider back in 2012. We’ve, while we’ve tweaked it a little but not changed the appearance since. There were software updates however, since we’d been on the verge of signing up with a new organization for a long time I thought we’d wait until we could create an integrated practice website with an updated corporate design and improved capabilities. The first question. As you are a patient or caregiver who do you get details from the GP surgery? Check out the practice’s website and look up the date it last updated. Then consider, does it include the information I require? What other information is available there that you did not know about? If you’re dealing with a health issue, where should you look for answers? Tell me about it and I can work together to provide this.

Why aren’t websites up-to-date?

The reasons behind the inability to update websites regularly can be numerous, but most of them are due to the pressure of time. I was also concerned that if we altered our layout we’d be bombarded by patients who want to know where the items had been moved to which is similar to asking where you can find items through the aisles of the supermarket. While we update information often but the process isn’t very user-friendly as the layout and formatting aren’t easy to use and, from a practical standpoint it’s just another thing to be done.

Value for money or is it too costly?

The cost of launching a new website is an additional problem. The larger (or more well-funded) practices could choose to invest in a custom-designed product, but smaller practices could consider it an additional extra expense. A quality website will provide high value for money, and especially in providing patients with details on the best service that meets their requirements or provides access to local, reliable information on health issues and prevention of disease and self-care. One of the top priorities for the health care system in the present is to encourage people to utilize services with care. It is a challenge for people to use services responsibly. NHS is so intricate and confusing that it is difficult for people to find the right place to go? visit 111, your the local walk-in center or general practice, a specialist community services, A&E – the list continues. General Practice is considered to be the main entry point to the NHS and it is believed that it is their responsibility to direct patients. However, do you really think it is the GPs responsibility to explain all of the available options? The design and content of a good website can facilitate easy access to information and effective signposting of services without waiting in a phone waiting room. However, many practices purchase the most basic off the shelf template-based website at less than PS500 annually and provide no direction on what to do within the NHS. Perhaps, all of those services should include information on what time to visit the GP?

From a’visit’ standpoint, we cannot longer see visitor or page views, which means we aren’t able to determine the amount of visitors to the site or if the information we collect is valuable. The subject of analytics for websites is a mystery to most practitioners.

Functionality – Frontfacing as well as back-office?

There are web-based services which not only host information but also collect information about patients by using online forms. They aim to stream inquiries from patients to certain teams i.e. administration, medication enquiries as well as clinical services (e.g. asthma questions). These are often used in conjunction with other’Online consultation forms. These websites are helping practices in the process of completing important data capture as well as provide a triage option however, how can practices be secure from risk i.e. data protection, clinical good practice etc. Certain practices are wary of opening new channels to accept more work streams, specifically because not all of them integrate with the practice’s Clinical Health Record system, therefore clinical coding is not available. Perhaps these functions should be seen as not being ‘additional’ rather as alternative methods to handle inquiries; more efficient than a appointment with the GP to address a question that is not clinical, right?

A majority of website providers offer an ‘back office’ or intranet feature for businesses to store and create information like room schedules, contact lists as well as staff rotas for major events such as fridge temperatures, policies and procedures and procedures. They are used by all employees and aid in appraisal preparation and proof of compliance to regulators. These functions are increasingly being substituted by better tools for collaboration and compliance, like GPTeamnet, Fourteen Fish etc

When searching for GP surgery website design make sure you contact Iatro Health

Do you know if practices have the appropriate design and communication abilities?

I’m not afraid to admit that I’ve got “font as well as layout’ problems. the limitations of text styles annoys me, and I’m not happy in this position because there are many other things to be done and I’ve never been able to have the effort to use it correctly and I’m sure that many Practice Managers are similar. I also lack the ability to design the layout work or integrate images or graphics to are able to replace written words.

Although templates have many choices however, the layout and design capabilities can be a bit unwieldy and awkward. It’s pretty easy to distinguish the difference between a custom, high-quality design from an off the shelf template. The majority of businesses wouldn’t be able to determine where to begin when it comes to placing the most commonly used items or pages in the front of the page or creating eye-catching designs that entice users and communicate effectively.

NHS Digital have kindly provided instructions to us to follow I recently shared it with other Practices , and I it is unlikely that anyone has taken the time to read it or implemented changes in response – I’m sure I’ve not had the time.

This is a part of NHS Digital, creating standards that are designed to guarantee accessibility and inclusion as well as a good user experience. A lot of websites don’t take into account the ever-growing need for a good designs and procedures that are accessible. hoping that their website meets the legal standards for accessibility and inclusiveness. This guide is ideal for designers, but is beyond the knowledge and skill of most practitioners and I’m not sure what to do to check our current service provider against these requirements. It would be beneficial that any company offering an online service could demonstrate that they are in compliance with this standard to allow customers to be confirmed prior to purchasing.

NHS Generic information repeated?

The latest GMS GP contract requires practices to maintain an up-to present and well-informed online presence in the year 2020 (page 35). If we decide to go with the ‘Digital First’ method for those who decide to do this, the primary function of a website is being replaced by many other applications. There are apps everywhere, here, and everywhere. More practices make use of social media to distribute information rapidly and widely, along with traditional publications and posters within the surgery. There are many other online services that are available, or methods for patients to access these services using alternative browsers to the web.

Don’t overlook that NHS.UK (not known as NHS Choices any more) has created a distinct website for each practice, and certain of the National database of performance links on this website i.e. stars and reviews about the service provided. The practice’s site has always been part of the basic General Medical Services contract requirement for a while, but I doubt that many practices have updated their website, as well as their own. Many will simply connect to their own site. Therefore, every practice will have hyperlinks to GP comments on surveys and star ratings Who’s who, what time we’re open etc across multiple locations. This is yet another reason for outdated information. Connecting to is made by the provider of the clinical system (i.e. which online services are linked) which feeds the national contract management tools such like those in the Primary Care Web tool. It’s also the place in which CQC will seek comments and feedback.

Primary care networks working as primary care

As more practices merge and form networks to provide shared services, accessibility and information should be available via the same page, and not duplicated across different websites. Although some practices would prefer to maintain their own “front door’ in order to ensure that they remain a familiar place with patients, the majority will gladly give up the back office’ responsibility of updating their websites in conjunction with other NHS websites and other services.

Social Media, Reviews , and Comments

Things are now getting interesting as patients ‘check in’ and look back on their experience with tools such as Facebook, Google review and I Want Great Care . These platforms allow patients to “like” or comment on their experience after attendance Practices can decide to own these websites and either respond or deny however they are not able to delete comments. They will remain there for others to read and with no response. Some practices don’t like these platforms and are incredibly afraid of security breaches and creating new channels for communication. They might have unfavorable experiences with social media and do not want to take on the tasks of training staff to be proficient and safe in a field that crosses into leisure and other activities outside of work.

If utilized properly social media is an efficient alternatives to communication that are suitable for users on mobile devices. The recent blog post from one clinic reached over 1 million users to provide them with information about cervical screening. This promotes interaction instead of one-way push of information and can be able to reach a large audience quickly and with minimal effort.

Many practices are using messaging and social media to interact with patients or groups, as well as whole segments of the population that practice and also provide opportunities for “communities of interests” and large-scale communication in federated levels of General Practice. This is a must as part of any modern communications system.

Online access to services

Since more and more services are being offered online, developers of applications offer better options to GP practice’s website for transactions such as scheduling appointments, cancelling appointments, placing orders for medicines, etc. The market approach is being applied to the creation of these services online and practices are struggling to keep pace and educate their teams to provide information and guidance on the available options for their patients. Each app appears to provide distinct functions. This means that the your choice of app will be based upon the requirements of the patient.
Based on the service provider, certain websites connect to a clinic’s medical system for online services, but they can only provide the same online service but there aren’t many options. While patients have the option of choosing from a range of ways to use online services, at present the website providers aren’t allowing this option. This is a problem for patients and practices when they want to provide and utilize a range options of services online. The only method to accomplish this is to post widgets instead of weblinks apps that advertise the services to patients. Four of the current providers: Evergreen Life, Patient Access, Dimec and Iplato all offer apps for messaging, cancellation, booking prescriptions medical records viewers, etc but not all offer browsers. In contrast, some online consultation services only use browsers. The NHS application is scheduled to launch in the near future however we don’t know how it connects to a practice site or browser.